I think K affs tend to lose more of these debates when they adopt a middle ground perspective in which they try to do something with the topic but not affirm the entirety of the resolution. This is because most of these scenarios are where the theory "arguments" are not arguments. Rather, I will just reject the argument if the theoretical objection is well argued and explained. I believe strongly in technical debating, but a conceded blimpy theoretical objection won't be a reason to reject the team. teams read the same conditionality block regardless if they have read one or four conditional options). I feel that counter interpretations are largely self serving (not a reason to not make one) and that interpretations on theory debates are much more persuasive when your offense is centered around your interpretation, which I feel has become largely lacking (ex. ![]() The impact level needs to be clearly articulated, especially by the affirmative if you want my ballot. Theory: I resolve these debates much like topicality. That means good impact analysis, good explanations of standards and how I should evaluate each team's vision of the topic. Explain how you want me to evaluate the debate. If you have good cards to substantiate your args that goes a long way and matters for me. Some arguments can be more persuasive to me than others, and I will try my best to avoid any intervention on my part, and I feel that you as a debater should do what you feel is best. While I try to adopt the ideology of a 'tabula rasa' I find that it is not entirely successful. I find that while judging, if the debaters can isolate and clearly articulate the nexus questions of the round, it becomes easier to judge, regardless of any predilections. Take that as you will, but make sure to place an emphasis on clarity. I have never participated or judged a virtual debate prior to this tournament. I have been removed from the debate community since 2019. Label the subject line as: Tournament - Round # - Aff Team vs Neg Team Northwestern Law - put this one on the chain for high school - put this one and the above on the chain for college debate. Is it going to be the place where the robot uprising starts? Let us know what you think in the comments section below.University of Kentucky 2018/Assistant Debate Coach for UK 2018-2019 There’s going to be plenty of room for a lot of different projects, and based on Musk’s previous comments, it sounds like Tesla is going to make it an important hub. Tesla first bought 2,100 acres, more than for any other factories, to build the new plant and then it later purchased an extra 381-acre piece of land adjacent to the original one. My best guess for Tesla Bot production would be Gigafactory Texas. The site of the factory is Tesla’s largest in the world and could accommodate a lot of expansions.Īt the Tesla AI Day event, Musk said that the company is aiming to have a working prototype of the Tesla Bot next year, but he didn’t say when it would be available to buy. ![]() Tesla is already building Gigafactory Texas in Austin with planned production of the Model Y, Cybertruck, Tesla Semi, and battery cells. While not a confirmation, it could hint at Tesla planning the production of Tesla Bot in Austin. “The test engineer will develop test processes, data infrastructure, test equipment, and automated test scripts that will accelerate the production of mobile robotics systems.” Interestingly, the description of this job, “Test Engineer – Tesla Bot,” is the only one that mentions production: Now Electrek has spotted new listings posted by Chris Walti, Tesla’s mobile robotics manager in charge of Tesla Bot:Īll of the new positions are based in Palo Alto, where Tesla’s headquarters are located, aside from one job based in Austin. When Elon Musk announced plans for Tesla Bot, a humanoid robot equipped with artificial intelligence aimed at completing general boring tasks, it almost sounded like another one of his jokes.īut as we previously reported, it is a real project, and Tesla already started hiring for it with four new job listings related to the project last week. One of the new postings even hints at production in Austin, Texas. Tesla is adding more job postings related to building its humanoid robot: Tesla Bot.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |