That caveat aside, I tried a LOT of alternatives when I was picking my own solution and was unable to find a better pair. What you can do is use the arbitrary fields to organize your own data. website login, credit card data, passport, etc), to my knowledge no clients yet do this. While theoretically this could be used with a smart interface that intelligently adapted to different entry types (e.g. The keepass database format allows arbitrary key/value pairs to be stored with each entry. The pair I use seem to match all your criteria perfectly with one caveat. I would actually recommend not using the original client software and using some of the alternatives instead. The 2.x series is basically a rewrite with many advancements that includes a port that will run under Mono for Linux, OSX and BSD support. and the 1.x series only worked on that platform (although it worked under WINE so some of us got Linux mileage out of it before there were alternatives. The original KeePass software was written for Windows. Your criteria includes several items including the need for custom data fields that were not possible in the version 1 database format (kdb) which restricted entries to a pre-defined set of fields that made is suitable for a rigid "login credentials manager" roll but not a "private data manager" role that you are looking for. The trick is going to be that you need to use version 2 of the data format (kdbx). The cryptography used has also been extensively peer reviewed so it is arguably safer than many smaller players or commercial solutions that use proprietary formats. The data format originally conceived for KeePass is both well established and widely supported. Data formatĪs far as password-manager data formats that are interchangeable go, there is basically one 800 pound gorilla in the room. KeepassX 2 + Keepass2Android use the same data format and are the only pair I know of to meet all your criteria, even though there are a couple "gotchas". As long as the data file is completely inter-operable, any combination of unrelated apps will work. The easy thing about your criteria is that you don't actually need a matched set. Also I couldn't get the desktop app working (it required an existing database, which was of course not there to start with), using the same database on both ends involves permanent renaming of the file (both ends are fixed to different file names), plus the Desktop has trouble with mixed-case directory names on case sensitive file-systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |